2005 • Holden
UTE
Holden UTE 3.6 V6 (238 Hp) 2005Overall Score73.75/100
2005 Holden UTE vs 2004 Honda MDX Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Honda
MDX
Honda MDX 3.5 i V6 LS (243 Hp) 2004Overall Score74.5/100
WINNER
Honda MDX
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Holden UTESpecificationHonda MDX
HoldenMakeHonda
UTEModelMDX
2005Model year2004
Pick-upBody typeEstate
2Seats7
2Doors4
Performance
Holden UTESpecificationHonda MDX
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
3565 ccEngine displacement3471 cc
238 HPPower243 HP
320 NmTorque328 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Holden UTESpecificationHonda MDX
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank73 lt
—Extra-urban consumption13,9 lt
—Average consumption10,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Holden UTESpecificationHonda MDX
5052 mmLength4789 mm
1844 mmWidth1955 mm
1476 mmHeight1744 mm
1535 KgWeight2065 Kg
2939 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Holden UTE and 2004 Honda MDX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Honda MDX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableDodge Intrepid vs Holden UTE2004 and 2005 model years
VSImage unavailableMercedes-Benz Viano vs Holden UTE2004 and 2005 model years
VSImage unavailableIsuzu Axiom vs Holden UTE2004 and 2005 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableHonda MDX vs Holden UTE2004 and 2005 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableChrysler Pacifica vs Holden UTE2004 and 2005 model yearsComments are loading…