DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Holden Monaro vs 2003 Bristol Blenheim Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Bristol Blenheim

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeBristol
MonaroModelBlenheim
2005Model year2003
CoupeBody typeCoupe
4Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

5,3 s0–100 km/h5,4 s
240 km/hTop speed250 km/h
5655 ccEngine displacement5900 cc
408 HPPower390 HP
460 NmTorque500 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank82 lt
—Urban consumption18 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4790 mmLength4825 mm
1840 mmWidth1765 mm
1400 mmHeight1440 mm
1640 KgWeight1755 Kg
2790 mmWheelbase2900 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Holden Monaro and 2003 Bristol Blenheim approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Bristol Blenheim leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…