DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Holden Monaro vs 2005 Nissan Armada Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Armada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeNissan
MonaroModelArmada
2004Model year2005
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats8
2Doors5

Performance

6,0 s0–100 km/h7,3 s
240 km/hTop speed185 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement5552 cc
306 HPPower305 HP
460 NmTorque522 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank106 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption18,1 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption12,4 lt
—Average consumption15,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size265/70 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4790 mmLength5255 mm
1840 mmWidth2002 mm
1400 mmHeight1913 mm
1640 KgWeight2340 Kg
2790 mmWheelbase3130 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Holden Monaro and 2005 Nissan Armada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Armada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…