DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Holden Frontera vs 1996 Alfa Romeo 155 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 155

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeAlfa Romeo
FronteraModel155
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
147 km/hTop speed195 km/h
2771 ccEngine displacement2500 cc
113 HPPower125 HP
260 NmTorque294 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank63 lt
16 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
245/70 R16Tyre size205/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4192 mmLength4443 mm
1780 mmWidth1700 mm
1721 mmHeight1440 mm
1828 KgWeight1340 Kg
2330 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Holden Frontera and 1996 Alfa Romeo 155 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 155 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…