DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Holden Frontera vs 1995 Volvo 940 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 940

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeVolvo
FronteraModel940
1996Model year1995
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

13,5 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
147 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement2316 cc
136 HPPower131 HP
202 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption12,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,1 lt
9 ltAverage consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/70 R15Tyre size185/65 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4192 mmLength4871 mm
1780 mmWidth1750 mm
1721 mmHeight1425 mm
1828 KgWeight1360 Kg
2330 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Holden Frontera and 1995 Volvo 940 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 940 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…