DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Holden Frontera vs 1996 Mitsubishi Space Wagon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Wagon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeMitsubishi
FronteraModelSpace Wagon
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
3Doors5

Performance

13,5 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
147 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
136 HPPower133 HP
202 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
9 ltAverage consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/70 R15Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4192 mmLength4515 mm
1780 mmWidth1695 mm
1721 mmHeight1615 mm
1828 KgWeight1351 Kg
2330 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Holden Frontera and 1996 Mitsubishi Space Wagon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Wagon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…