DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Holden Frontera vs 1996 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeMazda
FronteraModel626
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

13,5 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
147 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
136 HPPower115 HP
202 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
9 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/70 R15Tyre size185/70 R14 88 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4192 mmLength4600 mm
1780 mmWidth1690 mm
1721 mmHeight1465 mm
1828 KgWeight1230 Kg
2330 mmWheelbase2575 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Holden Frontera and 1996 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…