DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Holden Cruze vs 2005 ZAZ 1102 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Cruze

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeZAZ
CruzeModel1102
2005Model year2005
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

0 km/hTop speed151 km/h
1490 ccEngine displacement1197 cc
100 HPPower58 HP
138 NmTorque90 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
41 ltFuel tank38 lt
7,2 ltUrban consumption—
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size155/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3625 mmLength3708 mm
1640 mmWidth1564 mm
1605 mmHeight1410 mm
1000 KgWeight745 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2320 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Holden Cruze and 2005 ZAZ 1102 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Cruze leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…