2003 • Holden
Cruze
Holden Cruze 1.5i 16V (100 Hp) 2003Overall Score56.5/100
2003 Holden Cruze vs 2003 Toyota Cami Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Toyota
Cami
Toyota Cami 1.3i 16V P (90 Hp) 2003Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Holden Cruze
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
56.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Holden CruzeSpecificationToyota Cami
HoldenMakeToyota
CruzeModelCami
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Holden CruzeSpecificationToyota Cami
0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1490 ccEngine displacement1297 cc
100 HPPower90 HP
138 NmTorque123 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Holden CruzeSpecificationToyota Cami
PetrolFuel typePetrol
41 ltFuel tank46 lt
7,2 ltUrban consumption—
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Holden CruzeSpecificationToyota Cami
3625 mmLength3785 mm
1640 mmWidth1555 mm
1605 mmHeight1695 mm
1000 KgWeight1050 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2420 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Holden Cruze and 2003 Toyota Cami approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Holden Cruze leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…