DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Holden Commodore vs 2002 Pontiac Firebird Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Pontiac Firebird

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakePontiac
CommodoreModelFirebird
2005Model year2002
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,0 s
0 km/hTop speed250 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement5665 cc
320 HPPower314 HP
464 NmTorque461 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank59 lt
13 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt
—Average consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/40 R18Tyre size235/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4891 mmLength4910 mm
1842 mmWidth1890 mm
1425 mmHeight1300 mm
1615 KgWeight1585 Kg
2788 mmWheelbase2570 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Holden Commodore and 2002 Pontiac Firebird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Pontiac Firebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…