DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Holden Commodore vs 2004 Lincoln Mark LT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln Mark LT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeLincoln
CommodoreModelMark LT
2005Model year2004
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement5403 cc
320 HPPower304 HP
464 NmTorque481 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank114 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears4
235/40 R18Tyre size265/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4891 mmLength5685 mm
1842 mmWidth2004 mm
1425 mmHeight1867 mm
1615 KgWeight2645 Kg
2788 mmWheelbase3518 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Holden Commodore and 2004 Lincoln Mark LT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln Mark LT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…