DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Holden Commodore vs 2002 Bristol Blenheim Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Bristol Blenheim

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeBristol
CommodoreModelBlenheim
2005Model year2002
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

6,9 s0–100 km/h5,4 s
234 km/hTop speed250 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement5898 cc
340 HPPower354 HP
470 NmTorque500 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank82 lt
13 ltUrban consumption18 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
235/45 R17Tyre size215/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4884 mmLength4825 mm
1842 mmWidth1765 mm
1450 mmHeight1440 mm
1640 KgWeight1740 Kg
2788 mmWheelbase2900 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Holden Commodore and 2002 Bristol Blenheim approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Bristol Blenheim leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…