DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Holden Commodore vs 2005 Nissan Armada Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Armada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeNissan
CommodoreModelArmada
2002Model year2005
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats8
4Doors5

Performance

6,9 s0–100 km/h7,3 s
234 km/hTop speed185 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement5552 cc
306 HPPower305 HP
460 NmTorque522 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank106 lt
13 ltUrban consumption18,1 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption12,4 lt
—Average consumption15,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/55 R16Tyre size265/70 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4964 mmLength5255 mm
1842 mmWidth2002 mm
1450 mmHeight1913 mm
1640 KgWeight2340 Kg
2788 mmWheelbase3130 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Holden Commodore and 2005 Nissan Armada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Armada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…