DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Holden Commodore vs 2002 Hummer H2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Commodore

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeHummer
CommodoreModelH2
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeOff-road araç, SUV
5Seats4
4Doors5

Performance

6,9 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
234 km/hTop speed160 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement5967 cc
306 HPPower321 HP
460 NmTorque488 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank121 lt
13 ltUrban consumption25 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption12 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
225/55 R16Tyre size315/70 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4964 mmLength4820 mm
1842 mmWidth2063 mm
1450 mmHeight2080 mm
1640 KgWeight2901 Kg
2788 mmWheelbase3118 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Holden Commodore and 2002 Hummer H2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Commodore leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…