DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Holden Commodore vs 1998 Lincoln Town Car Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln Town Car

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

72.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeLincoln
CommodoreModelTown Car
1996Model year1998
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed180 km/h
4981 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
248 HPPower223 HP
400 NmTorque360 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank72 lt
—Urban consumption13,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,8 lt
13,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/65 R15 HTyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4861 mmLength5470 mm
1794 mmWidth1985 mm
1448 mmHeight1470 mm
1400 KgWeight1950 Kg
2731 mmWheelbase2990 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Holden Commodore and 1998 Lincoln Town Car approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln Town Car leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…