1992 • Holden
Commodore
Holden Commodore 5.0i V8 SS (248 Hp) 1992Overall Score72.75/100
1992 Holden Commodore vs 1994 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1994 • Land Rover
Range Rover
Land Rover Range Rover Range 4.6 V8 HSE (224 Hp) 1994Overall Score72.5/100
WINNER
Holden Commodore
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
72.75–72.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Holden CommodoreSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
HoldenMakeLand Rover
CommodoreModelRange Rover
1992Model year1994
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Holden CommodoreSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
8,0 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
200 km/hTop speed196 km/h
4981 ccEngine displacement4553 cc
248 HPPower224 HP
400 NmTorque380 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Holden CommodoreSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank100 lt
—Urban consumption22,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption16,4 lt
13,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Holden CommodoreSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
205/65 R15 HTyre size255/65 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Holden CommodoreSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
4861 mmLength4713 mm
1794 mmWidth1853 mm
1448 mmHeight1817 mm
1400 KgWeight2220 Kg
2731 mmWheelbase2745 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 Holden Commodore and 1994 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Holden Commodore leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…