DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Holden Commodore vs 1995 Ford Crown Victoria Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Crown Victoria

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeFord
CommodoreModelCrown Victoria
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats6
4Doors4

Performance

7,9 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed180 km/h
5034 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
224 HPPower193 HP
385 NmTorque353 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption18 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10 lt
13,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/65 R15 VTyre size215/70 R15 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4861 mmLength5397 mm
1794 mmWidth1976 mm
1448 mmHeight1440 mm
1450 KgWeight1720 Kg
2731 mmWheelbase2905 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Holden Commodore and 1995 Ford Crown Victoria approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Crown Victoria leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…