1992 • Holden
Commodore
Holden Commodore 5.0 i V8 SS (224 Hp) 1992Overall Score69.75/100
1992 Holden Commodore vs 1996 Ford Expedition Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Ford
Expedition
Ford Expedition 5.4 i V8 16V XLT (232 Hp) 1996Overall Score70.5/100
WINNER
Ford Expedition
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Holden CommodoreSpecificationFord Expedition
HoldenMakeFord
CommodoreModelExpedition
1992Model year1996
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Holden CommodoreSpecificationFord Expedition
7,9 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
210 km/hTop speed180 km/h
5034 ccEngine displacement5398 cc
224 HPPower232 HP
385 NmTorque441 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Holden CommodoreSpecificationFord Expedition
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank98 lt
—Urban consumption18,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption13,1 lt
13,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Holden CommodoreSpecificationFord Expedition
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/65 R15 VTyre size255/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Holden CommodoreSpecificationFord Expedition
4861 mmLength5200 mm
1794 mmWidth2000 mm
1448 mmHeight1900 mm
1450 KgWeight—
2731 mmWheelbase3020 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 Holden Commodore and 1996 Ford Expedition approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Expedition leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…