DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Holden Commodore vs 1996 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeFord
CommodoreModelExplorer
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3958 cc
200 HPPower155 HP
304 NmTorque298 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank72 lt
11,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15 HTyre size225/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4861 mmLength4429 mm
1794 mmWidth1783 mm
1448 mmHeight1714 mm
1370 KgWeight1671 Kg
2731 mmWheelbase2593 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Holden Commodore and 1996 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…