DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Holden Commodore vs 1994 Chevrolet Lumina Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Commodore

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–66.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeChevrolet
CommodoreModelLumina
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
200 HPPower175 HP
304 NmTorque305 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank77 lt
11,5 ltAverage consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/65 R15 HTyre size205/70 R15 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4861 mmLength4844 mm
1794 mmWidth1877 mm
1448 mmHeight1669 mm
1370 KgWeight1685 Kg
2731 mmWheelbase2788 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Holden Commodore and 1994 Chevrolet Lumina approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Commodore leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…