DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Holden Commodore vs 1996 Nissan Safari Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Commodore

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–63.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeNissan
CommodoreModelSafari
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3813 ccEngine displacement4169 cc
177 HPPower145 HP
320 NmTorque331 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
63 ltFuel tank95 lt
11,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears4
205/65 R15 HTyre size265/70 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4861 mmLength4845 mm
1794 mmWidth1930 mm
1448 mmHeight1805 mm
1370 KgWeight—
2731 mmWheelbase2970 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Holden Commodore and 1996 Nissan Safari approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Commodore leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…