DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Holden Commodore vs 1996 Land Rover Discovery Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Commodore

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

66.75–66.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeLand Rover
CommodoreModelDiscovery
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,5 s
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
3813 ccEngine displacement3947 cc
177 HPPower182 HP
320 NmTorque312 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank89 lt
—Average consumption14,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/65 R15 HTyre size205/80 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4861 mmLength4524 mm
1794 mmWidth1810 mm
1448 mmHeight1960 mm
—Weight2020 Kg
2731 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Holden Commodore and 1996 Land Rover Discovery approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Commodore leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…