1992 • Holden
Commodore
Holden Commodore 3.8 i V6 SS (177 Hp) 1992Overall Score66.75/100
1992 Holden Commodore vs 1992 Mercury Cougar Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1992 • Mercury
Cougar
Mercury Cougar 1992Overall Score67.5/100
WINNER
Mercury Cougar
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
66.75–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Holden CommodoreSpecificationMercury Cougar
HoldenMakeMercury
CommodoreModelCougar
1992Model year1992
SedanBody type—
5Seats—
4Doors—
Performance
Holden CommodoreSpecificationMercury Cougar
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3813 ccEngine displacement3797 cc
177 HPPower220 HP
320 NmTorque292 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Holden CommodoreSpecificationMercury Cougar
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears—
205/65 R15 HTyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Holden CommodoreSpecificationMercury Cougar
4861 mmLength—
1794 mmWidth—
1448 mmHeight—
2731 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 Holden Commodore and 1992 Mercury Cougar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mercury Cougar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSLand Rover Range Rover vs Holden Commodore1992 and 1992 model years
VSHolden Statesman vs Holden Commodore1992 and 1992 model yearsImage unavailableVSFord F-150 vs Holden Commodore1992 and 1992 model yearsVSMercury Cougar vs Holden Commodore1992 and 1992 model years
VSLand Rover Defender vs Holden Commodore1992 and 1992 model yearsComments are loading…