DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Holden Commodore vs 1992 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Commodore

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

66.75–66.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeLand Rover
CommodoreModelRange Rover
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,7 s
0 km/hTop speed179 km/h
3813 ccEngine displacement3947 cc
177 HPPower188 HP
320 NmTorque319 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank82 lt
—Urban consumption18,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,5 lt
—Average consumption13,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/65 R15 HTyre size205/80 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4861 mmLength4449 mm
1794 mmWidth1818 mm
1448 mmHeight1790 mm
—Weight1980 Kg
2731 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Holden Commodore and 1992 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Commodore leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…