DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Holden Commodore vs 1992 Land Rover Defender Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Commodore

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

66.75–66.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeLand Rover
CommodoreModelDefender
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats6
4Doors2

Performance

0 km/hTop speed135 km/h
3813 ccEngine displacement3528 cc
177 HPPower134 HP
320 NmTorque253 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Average consumption17,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/65 R15 HTyre size205/80 R16 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4861 mmLength3722 mm
1794 mmWidth1790 mm
1448 mmHeight2000 mm
—Weight1627 Kg
2731 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Holden Commodore and 1992 Land Rover Defender approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Commodore leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…