DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Holden Commodore vs 2000 Pontiac Bonneville Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Pontiac Bonneville

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

69.75–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakePontiac
CommodoreModelBonneville
1999Model year2000
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

7,9 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
200 km/hTop speed220 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
233 HPPower243 HP
375 NmTorque380 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
73 ltFuel tank70 lt
13 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt
—Average consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size235/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5040 mmLength5145 mm
1845 mmWidth1885 mm
1545 mmHeight1440 mm
1620 KgWeight1720 Kg
2940 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Holden Commodore and 2000 Pontiac Bonneville approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Pontiac Bonneville leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…