DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Holden Commodore vs 2000 Holden Calais Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Calais

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

69.75–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeHolden
CommodoreModelCalais
1999Model year2000
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

7,9 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
200 km/hTop speed226 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
233 HPPower233 HP
375 NmTorque375 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
73 ltFuel tank75 lt
13 ltUrban consumption13 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5040 mmLength4964 mm
1845 mmWidth1842 mm
1545 mmHeight1450 mm
1620 KgWeight1655 Kg
2940 mmWheelbase2788 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Holden Commodore and 2000 Holden Calais approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Calais leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…