DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Holden Commodore vs 2000 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Commodore

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

69.75–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeHolden
CommodoreModelCommodore
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,9 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
226 km/hTop speed226 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
233 HPPower233 HP
375 NmTorque375 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank75 lt
13 ltUrban consumption13 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/55 R15Tyre size225/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4884 mmLength4884 mm
1842 mmWidth1842 mm
1450 mmHeight1450 mm
1670 KgWeight1670 Kg
2788 mmWheelbase2788 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Holden Commodore and 2000 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Commodore leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…