DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Holden Commodore vs 1996 Buick Regal Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Buick Regal

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.75–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeBuick
CommodoreModelRegal
1997Model year1996
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors2

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h—
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
200 HPPower173 HP
304 NmTorque298 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank62 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt
—Average consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4 Hydramatic
205/65 R15Tyre size205/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4884 mmLength4917 mm
1842 mmWidth1842 mm
1450 mmHeight1346 mm
1550 KgWeight1498 Kg
2788 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Holden Commodore and 1996 Buick Regal approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Buick Regal leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…