1997 • Holden
Combo
Holden Combo 1.6 i 16V (106 Hp) 1997Overall Score50.25/100
1997 Holden Combo vs 1997 Ford Escort Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Ford
Escort
Ford Escort 1.8 TD (90 Hp) 1997Overall Score49.25/100
WINNER
Holden Combo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Holden ComboSpecificationFord Escort
HoldenMakeFord
ComboModelEscort
1997Model year1997
Pick-upBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Holden ComboSpecificationFord Escort
11,0 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
190 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1753 cc
106 HPPower90 HP
148 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Holden ComboSpecificationFord Escort
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
46 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Holden ComboSpecificationFord Escort
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/45 R16Tyre size175/70 R13 T
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Holden ComboSpecificationFord Escort
4015 mmLength4293 mm
1610 mmWidth1700 mm
—Height1394 mm
1105 KgWeight1155 Kg
2430 mmWheelbase2525 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1997 Holden Combo and 1997 Ford Escort approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Holden Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…