DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Holden Caprice vs 2002 Chevrolet Camaro Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Camaro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeChevrolet
CapriceModelCamaro
2005Model year2002
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors3

Performance

7,7 s0–100 km/h6,0 s
230 km/hTop speed254 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement5665 cc
306 HPPower288 HP
460 NmTorque437 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank59 lt
14 ltUrban consumption19,8 lt
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears6
225/55 R16VTyre size245/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5237 mmLength4908 mm
1847 mmWidth1882 mm
1459 mmHeight1322 mm
1735 KgWeight1644 Kg
2939 mmWheelbase2566 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Holden Caprice and 2002 Chevrolet Camaro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Camaro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…