DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Holden Caprice vs 1998 Ford Expedition Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Expedition

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeFord
CapriceModelExpedition
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
200 km/hTop speed180 km/h
4981 ccEngine displacement5398 cc
224 HPPower232 HP
385 NmTorque441 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank98 lt
—Urban consumption18,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption13,1 lt
13,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15HTyre size255/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4989 mmLength5200 mm
1794 mmWidth2000 mm
1479 mmHeight1900 mm
1617 KgWeight—
2825 mmWheelbase3020 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Holden Caprice and 1998 Ford Expedition approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Expedition leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…