2000 • Holden
Caprice
Holden Caprice 3.8 i V6 SC (233 Hp) 2000Overall Score70.75/100
2000 Holden Caprice vs 1998 Holden Commodore Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Holden
Commodore
Holden Commodore 3.8 i V6 S.G (233 Hp) 1998Overall Score69.75/100
WINNER
Holden Caprice
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
70.75–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Holden CapriceSpecificationHolden Commodore
HoldenMakeHolden
CapriceModelCommodore
2000Model year1998
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Holden CapriceSpecificationHolden Commodore
—0–100 km/h7,9 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
233 HPPower233 HP
375 NmTorque375 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Holden CapriceSpecificationHolden Commodore
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank73 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Holden CapriceSpecificationHolden Commodore
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/55 R16VTyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Holden CapriceSpecificationHolden Commodore
5237 mmLength5040 mm
1847 mmWidth1845 mm
1459 mmHeight1545 mm
1722 KgWeight1620 Kg
2939 mmWheelbase2940 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Holden Caprice and 1998 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Holden Caprice leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…