DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Holden Caprice vs 2004 Nissan Pathfinder Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Pathfinder

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeNissan
CapriceModelPathfinder
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,7 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
0 km/hTop speed175 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3498 cc
200 HPPower220 HP
304 NmTorque363 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank80 lt
12 ltUrban consumption18,7 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption12 lt
—Average consumption14,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
225/55 R16 VTyre size255/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5237 mmLength4640 mm
1847 mmWidth1820 mm
1459 mmHeight1750 mm
1690 KgWeight1950 Kg
2939 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Holden Caprice and 2004 Nissan Pathfinder approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Pathfinder leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…