DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Holden Calais vs 2003 Ford Expedition Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Calais

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

76.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeFord
CalaisModelExpedition
2005Model year2003
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,0 s
0 km/hTop speed165 km/h
4981 ccEngine displacement5398 cc
243 HPPower264 HP
400 NmTorque474 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
73 ltFuel tank113 lt
—Urban consumption19,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption14,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size265/70 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4885 mmLength5198 mm
1840 mmWidth1996 mm
1450 mmHeight1992 mm
1630 KgWeight2555 Kg
2790 mmWheelbase3023 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Holden Calais and 2003 Ford Expedition approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Calais leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…