DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Holden Calais vs 2005 Mitsubishi Galant Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Galant

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeMitsubishi
CalaisModelGalant
2003Model year2005
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,9 s0–100 km/h—
226 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3828 cc
233 HPPower230 HP
375 NmTorque250 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank67 lt
13 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4964 mmLength4865 mm
1842 mmWidth1840 mm
1450 mmHeight1485 mm
1655 KgWeight1560 Kg
2788 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Holden Calais and 2005 Mitsubishi Galant approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Galant leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…