DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Holden Calais vs 2000 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Commodore

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

69.75–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeHolden
CalaisModelCommodore
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,0 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
207 HPPower207 HP
305 NmTorque305 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption11 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/55 R16VTyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4964 mmLength4964 mm
1842 mmWidth1842 mm
1450 mmHeight1450 mm
1620 KgWeight1575 Kg
2788 mmWheelbase2788 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Holden Calais and 2000 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Commodore leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…