1999 • Holden
Calais
Holden Calais 3.8 i V6 (207 Hp) 1999Overall Score69.75/100
1999 Holden Calais vs 2002 Holden Commodore Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Holden
Commodore
Holden Commodore 3.8 i V6 Executive (207 Hp) 2002Overall Score70.75/100
WINNER
Holden Commodore
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
69.75–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Holden CalaisSpecificationHolden Commodore
HoldenMakeHolden
CalaisModelCommodore
1999Model year2002
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Holden CalaisSpecificationHolden Commodore
—0–100 km/h9,5 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
207 HPPower207 HP
305 NmTorque305 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Holden CalaisSpecificationHolden Commodore
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption11 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Holden CalaisSpecificationHolden Commodore
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/55 R16VTyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Holden CalaisSpecificationHolden Commodore
4964 mmLength5084 mm
1842 mmWidth1847 mm
1450 mmHeight1545 mm
1620 KgWeight1635 Kg
2788 mmWheelbase2938 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Holden Calais and 2002 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Holden Commodore leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…