1998 • Holden
Calais
Holden Calais 3.8 i V6 (207 Hp) 1998Overall Score69.75/100
1998 Holden Calais vs 1998 Ford Econoline Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Ford
Econoline
Ford Econoline 4.2 i V6 (197 Hp) 1998Overall Score70.5/100
WINNER
Ford Econoline
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Holden CalaisSpecificationFord Econoline
HoldenMakeFord
CalaisModelEconoline
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
4Doors4
Performance
Holden CalaisSpecificationFord Econoline
0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement4192 cc
207 HPPower197 HP
305 NmTorque339 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Holden CalaisSpecificationFord Econoline
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank132 lt
—Urban consumption16,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption13,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Holden CalaisSpecificationFord Econoline
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/55 R16VTyre size235/75 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Holden CalaisSpecificationFord Econoline
4964 mmLength5382 mm
1842 mmWidth2014 mm
1450 mmHeight2050 mm
1620 KgWeight2370 Kg
2788 mmWheelbase3505 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Holden Calais and 1998 Ford Econoline approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Econoline leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…