DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Holden Calais vs 1999 Holden Caprice Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Calais

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–63.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeHolden
CalaisModelCaprice
1998Model year1999
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
175 HPPower200 HP
295 NmTorque304 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption12 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,4 lt
12,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15 HTyre size225/55 R16 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4861 mmLength5237 mm
1794 mmWidth1847 mm
1443 mmHeight1459 mm
1454 KgWeight1690 Kg
2736 mmWheelbase2939 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Holden Calais and 1999 Holden Caprice approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Calais leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…