DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Holden Barina vs 2017 Nissan Juke Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Barina

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

64.5–64.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeNissan
BarinaModelJuke
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,5 s
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
116 HPPower117 HP
155 NmTorque158 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank46 lt
—Urban consumption8,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,2 lt
—Average consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x2
5Gears—
—TransmissionCVT
205/55 R16Tyre size15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4135 mm
—Width1767 mm
—Height1565 mm
—Weight1205 kg
—Luggage capacity354 lt

Additional Features

Nissan JukeDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPHill Start AssistCruise ControlComing HomeLeaving HomeTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerKeyless Startstart-stopPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsReversing CameraRain SensorLight SensorFolding MirrorsSunroofUSB PortBluetoothNavigation

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Holden Barina and 2017 Nissan Juke approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Barina leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…