DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Holden Barina vs 2017 Mitsubishi ASX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Barina

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

64.5–64.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeMitsubishi
BarinaModelASX
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,5 s
0 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
116 HPPower117 HP
155 NmTorque154 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption7,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,9 lt
—Average consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x2
5Gears5
—TransmissionManual
205/55 R16Tyre size18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4295 mm
—Width1770 mm
—Height1615 mm
—Weight1260 kg
—Luggage capacity419 lt

Additional Features

Mitsubishi ASXDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRElectronic Parking BrakeHill Start AssistCruise ControlComing HomeLeaving HomeTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRain SensorLight SensorUSB PortBluetoothNavigation

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Holden Barina and 2017 Mitsubishi ASX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Barina leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…