DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Holden Astra vs 2004 MG ZR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Holden AstraSpecificationMG ZR
HoldenMakeMG
AstraModelZR
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

Holden AstraSpecificationMG ZR
—0–100 km/h10,0 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
122 HPPower113 HP
170 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Holden AstraSpecificationMG ZR
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption7,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Holden AstraSpecificationMG ZR
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Holden AstraSpecificationMG ZR
4252 mmLength4011 mm
1709 mmWidth1690 mm
1425 mmHeight1400 mm
1145 KgWeight1155 Kg
2606 mmWheelbase2502 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Holden Astra and 2004 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…