DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Holden Apollo vs 1996 Holden Frontera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Apollo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeHolden
ApolloModelFrontera
1995Model year1996
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h13,5 s
190 km/hTop speed147 km/h
2164 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
125 HPPower136 HP
185 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
10,9 ltAverage consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/70 R14 HTyre size235/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4725 mmLength4192 mm
1770 mmWidth1780 mm
1400 mmHeight1721 mm
1350 KgWeight1828 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2330 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Holden Apollo and 1996 Holden Frontera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Apollo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…