2017 • Hennessey
Venom GT
Hennessey Venom GT 7.0 V8 (1261 Hp) 2017Overall Score93.5/100
2017 Hennessey Venom GT vs 2001 Callaway C12 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2001 • Callaway
C12
Callaway C12 5.7 i V8 (440 Hp) 2001Overall Score88.5/100
WINNER
Hennessey Venom GT
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 5 points.
93.5–88.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Hennessey Venom GTSpecificationCallaway C12
HennesseyMakeCallaway
Venom GTModelC12
2017Model year2001
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
2Seats2
2Doors2
Performance
Hennessey Venom GTSpecificationCallaway C12
—0–100 km/h4,3 s
435 km/hTop speed304 km/h
7000 ccEngine displacement5665 cc
1261 HPPower440 HP
1566 NmTorque520 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Hennessey Venom GTSpecificationCallaway C12
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank72 lt
—Urban consumption16 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Hennessey Venom GTSpecificationCallaway C12
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
265/30 R19; 345/30 R20Tyre size295/30 R19; 335/25 R19
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Hennessey Venom GTSpecificationCallaway C12
4655 mmLength4850 mm
1960 mmWidth2000 mm
1135 mmHeight1200 mm
1244 KgWeight1480 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2660 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Hennessey Venom GT and 2001 Callaway C12 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Hennessey Venom GT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
Comments are loading…