2007 • Great Wall
Wingle
Great Wall Wingle 2.8 TD (95 Hp) 2007Overall Score46.5/100
2007 Great Wall Wingle vs 2004 Mitsubishi Pajero Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Mitsubishi
Pajero
Mitsubishi Pajero 2.5 TD (99 Hp) 2004Overall Score45.5/100
WINNER
Great Wall Wingle
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.5–45.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Great Wall WingleSpecificationMitsubishi Pajero
Great WallMakeMitsubishi
WingleModelPajero
2007Model year2004
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Great Wall WingleSpecificationMitsubishi Pajero
28,0 s0–100 km/h18,5 s
140 km/hTop speed145 km/h
2771 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
95 HPPower99 HP
225 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Great Wall WingleSpecificationMitsubishi Pajero
DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank74 lt
—Urban consumption11 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9,5 lt
11,3 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Great Wall WingleSpecificationMitsubishi Pajero
4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/70 R16Tyre size235/70R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Great Wall WingleSpecificationMitsubishi Pajero
5040 mmLength4610 mm
1800 mmWidth1775 mm
1730 mmHeight1735 mm
1860 KgWeight1970 Kg
3050 mmWheelbase2725 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2007 Great Wall Wingle and 2004 Mitsubishi Pajero approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Great Wall Wingle leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…