DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Acura RDX vs 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Grand Cherokee

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AcuraMakeJeep
RDXModelGrand Cherokee
2016Model year2014
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,2 s
0 km/hTop speed202 km/h
3471 ccEngine displacement2987 cc
279 HPPower250 HP
342 NmTorque570 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank93 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
10,2 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears8
235/60 R18Tyre size265/60 R18; 265/50 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4685 mmLength4828 mm
1872 mmWidth1943 mm
1651 mmHeight1802 mm
1695-1715 KgWeight2403-2522 Kg
2685 mmWheelbase2915 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Acura RDX and 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Grand Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…