DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Great Wall Steed vs 2015 Mazda CX-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeMazda
SteedModelCX-3
2015Model year2015
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,0 s
0 km/hTop speed192 km/h
2237 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
106 HPPower120 HP
190 NmTorque204 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank48 lt
—Urban consumption7,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,9 lt
—Average consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
235/70 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5040 mmLength4275 mm
1800 mmWidth1765 mm
1730 mmHeight1535 mm
1565 KgWeight1155 Kg
3050 mmWheelbase2570 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Great Wall Steed and 2015 Mazda CX-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…