DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Great Wall Steed vs 2013 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeMazda
SteedModel3
2013Model year2013
Pick-upBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,9 s
0 km/hTop speed195 km/h
2237 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
106 HPPower120 HP
190 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank51 lt
—Urban consumption6,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
235/70 R16Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5040 mmLength4460 mm
1800 mmWidth1795 mm
1730 mmHeight1450 mm
1565 KgWeight1205 Kg
3050 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Great Wall Steed and 2013 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…