2007 • Great Wall
Safe
Great Wall Safe 2.2i (105 Hp) 2007Overall Score62.5/100
2007 Great Wall Safe vs 2007 Mazda Tribute Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2007 • Mazda
Tribute
Mazda Tribute 2.3 i 16V (150 Hp) 2007Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Mazda Tribute
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Great Wall SafeSpecificationMazda Tribute
Great WallMakeMazda
SafeModelTribute
2007Model year2007
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Great Wall SafeSpecificationMazda Tribute
—0–100 km/h10,7 s
140 km/hTop speed171 km/h
2237 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
105 HPPower150 HP
190 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Great Wall SafeSpecificationMazda Tribute
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Urban consumption13,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,5 lt
—Average consumption10,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Great Wall SafeSpecificationMazda Tribute
4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size215/70 R16 99 S
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Great Wall SafeSpecificationMazda Tribute
4860 mmLength4395 mm
—Width1800 mm
1820 mmHeight1710 mm
1640 KgWeight1455 Kg
—Wheelbase2620 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2007 Great Wall Safe and 2007 Mazda Tribute approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…